To try to understand what happened, let's look at the Reds' stats on the month:
Name | PA | %K | %BB | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | OPS | BIPaOPS | wOBA | SBRns | RC |
B. Phillips | 120 | 16% | 5% | 0.330 | 0.310 | 0.350 | 0.504 | 0.195 | 0.854 | 0.816 | 0.363 | -0.2 | 17 |
A. Dunn | 109 | 26% | 17% | 0.298 | 0.239 | 0.376 | 0.455 | 0.216 | 0.831 | 0.831 | 0.360 | 0.2 | 16 |
K. Griffey | 111 | 15% | 21% | 0.209 | 0.205 | 0.369 | 0.375 | 0.170 | 0.744 | 0.874 | 0.303 | 0.7 | 15 |
Hatteberg | 76 | 9% | 18% | 0.370 | 0.339 | 0.461 | 0.468 | 0.129 | 0.928 | 0.823 | 0.389 | 0.0 | 14 |
R. Freel | 103 | 18% | 3% | 0.293 | 0.242 | 0.301 | 0.326 | 0.084 | 0.627 | 0.643 | 0.285 | 0.3 | 10 |
Keppinger | 55 | 4% | 7% | 0.319 | 0.320 | 0.382 | 0.500 | 0.180 | 0.882 | 0.855 | 0.384 | 0.0 | 10 |
D. Ross | 72 | 25% | 10% | 0.273 | 0.231 | 0.306 | 0.446 | 0.215 | 0.752 | 0.792 | 0.315 | 0.0 | 8 |
Encarnacion | 86 | 20% | 8% | 0.259 | 0.221 | 0.302 | 0.312 | 0.091 | 0.614 | 0.679 | 0.282 | 0.2 | 8 |
J. Conine | 54 | 9% | 9% | 0.256 | 0.250 | 0.315 | 0.375 | 0.125 | 0.690 | 0.759 | 0.305 | 0.2 | 6 |
N. Hopper | 47 | 15% | 4% | 0.368 | 0.311 | 0.340 | 0.356 | 0.044 | 0.696 | 0.589 | 0.313 | -0.5 | 5 |
J. Hamilton | 16 | 31% | 6% | 0.500 | 0.357 | 0.438 | 0.643 | 0.286 | 1.080 | 0.870 | 0.460 | 0.0 | 4 |
J. Valentin | 43 | 19% | 0% | 0.294 | 0.238 | 0.256 | 0.286 | 0.048 | 0.542 | 0.557 | 0.243 | 0.0 | 3 |
A. Gonzalez | 35 | 31% | 6% | 0.318 | 0.212 | 0.257 | 0.303 | 0.091 | 0.560 | 0.542 | 0.250 | 0.0 | 2 |
P. Lopez | 40 | 15% | 3% | 0.219 | 0.184 | 0.225 | 0.237 | 0.053 | 0.462 | 0.602 | 0.211 | 0.0 | 2 |
J. Castro | 6 | 0% | 17% | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.000 | 0.900 | 0.724 | 0.420 | 0.0 | 1 |
Ok, first, the good:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81a9/b81a9f5ca0b3feacbc3b6b6fbaacaf8d0f7c9d08" alt=""
Scott Hatteberg was machine, though much of his on-base success (0.461) can be explained by his unusually high BABIP. Nevertheless, he continues to be of fine value on more active side of the Reds' 1B platoon. ... And therefore, he should have had trade value. But whatever.
For all my concerns about how Jeff Keppinger might push Encarnacion to the bench under Mackanin, there's no denying what a fine 55 PA's he had in July. I was very positive about Keppinger in my profile of him last February, and I'm excited to see him showing his worth in the big leagues. I do not see him as a starter, at least not with Eddie on the team, but I love him as an offensively-oriented 5th infielder.
And then the mediocre:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2621/f26218f5a2db0155cbdfd7ae881ebe7909c9625b" alt=""
Dave Ross posted a 0.750 OPS, and has not posted an OPS below 0.700 since April. His low OBP is not good, but his ISO of 0.215 is was in a virtual tie for the club lead last month. Given his defensive skills abilities behind the plate, I'm ok with this. ... though it sure would be nice if he could rediscover the 13% walk rate he posted last season.
And then there were the guys who had miserable months:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/081cf/081cfbe3bbcf5103a3a3150aebd21f734e468b8b" alt=""
Ryan Freel, on the other hand, has been positively awful since returning from his
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8c25/a8c256d4ba5274e2d576d2a44e447c069f8adb88" alt=""
Edwin Encarnacion actually had a worse month, by the numbers, than Freel, hitting just 0.221/0.302/0.312 in July. His BABIP was a bit low, but even adjusting it up to 0.300 doesn't push his OPS out of the 0.600's. Edwin's season, so far, is easily the most disappointing individual performance of the year. His strikeout and walk rates this season are pretty much where they were last season. But his line drive rate is down, and his isolated power is just better than half of what it was last season. I still have faith in the kid, and I think he can pull out of it--but if the Reds keep playing him (as they should), and he does not start to show improvement by the end of the season... Well...
Finally, the "reserve" Reds were even worse on the month, with the combination of Conine, Hopper, Valentin, Gonzalez, and Lopez creating just 18 runs in 219 plate appearances--a lower rate than Freel or Encarnacion. And those five players accounted for 22.5% of all Reds plate appearances in June. Combine that with Freel and Eddie's PA, and you have 42% of all Reds plate appearances in July providing replacement level (or worse) production. Frankly, it's a testament to the performance of the rest of the Red hitters that they still managed to score 4.4 runs per game.
I just posted this at RR, but what do you think about Keppinger as a possible platoon at 1B next year with Votto? Votto struggles against lefties (.690 OPS this year vs. .906 against righties), but Keppinger seems to put up much better numbers against lefties. Votto would still get about two-thirds of the starts, and during that time Keppinger can be a utility infielder/right-handed pinch hitter. What do you think?
ReplyDeleteI think it's a great idea. If Keppinger can keep hitting at an 800+ OPS clip, especially v. lefties, I think that'd be a fantastic use of him, and a great way to get him consistent at bats. It'd also be a nice way to leverage Votto's talents in his first year.
ReplyDelete-j