Table of Contents

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Craig Wilson

On Saturday, the Reds signed Craig Wilson to a minor league contract with an invitation to spring training. Wilson, 31, was a second-round selection in the 1995 amateur draft by the Toronto Blue Jays. Wilson has been a controversial player throughout his career due his tendency to strike out. Nevertheless, his overall offensive production has been good over most of his career, as evidenced by his career OPS+ of 113.

Wilson is apparently going to get a look as a right-handed bat at first base, probably just in case Keppinger fails to hit next season. What can we expect from him? Well, here are his recent offensive stats:
2005 28 PIT 238 29% 13% 22% 0.379 0.264 0.387 0.421 0.157 0.808 0.525 5.9 12.9
2006 29 PIT/NYY 395 31% 7% 17% 0.329 0.251 0.314 0.446 0.195 0.760 0.175 4.6 8.4
2007 30 ATL 69 36% 12% 15% 0.281 0.172 0.304 0.259 0.087 0.563 0 2.9 -1.5
3yrs --- --- 702 31% 9% 18% 0.341 0.248 0.338 0.420 0.173 0.758 0.7 4.8 19.9

Wilson has posted successively poorer numbers every season since at least 2004, and arguably (just looking at rate stats) since 2003. Over the past three years, his strikeout numbers have steadily been rising, his line drives have been steadily falling, and predictably his batting average has steadily fallen. His walk rate also took a big hit in '06, which sapped a major part of his offensive value. At least his power still seems to be present, assuming that 2007 is just a case of small sample sizes.

Baseball Prospectus-types would probably point to him as a classic case of a guy with "old player skills" declining quickly. But who knows? If he can recapture something similar to his 2005 season this year (or, his 2006 season, but with walks), he could provide some nice offensive value for the Reds against left-handed pitching.


Wilson has played first base and the corner outfield slots over the past several seasons. His 2003-2007 UZR numbers put him at +4 runs/season at first base, -9 runs/season in right field, and -41 runs/season in left field. I'm guessing the latter is a sample size aberration, so I'll say ~+0.5 wins/season at first, and -1.0 wins/season in the corner outfield. In other words, he really should only be playing first base.

Projected Value

Overall, if we take his 3-year average offensive rates and extrapolate to a full season, he's about a +1.5 WAR hitter, a +0.5 wins fielder (at first base), and he gets a -1.0 win value penalty for being a first baseman. That puts him at ~1.0 WAR. If we subtract another 0.5 wins for where he is on the aging curve, that gives a fairly reasonable projection for him next year of ~0.5 wins above replacement. And that's in a full season of work.

I'd put pretty big error bars around that, however. If he can hit like he did '05, he could be a +1-1.5 WAR player. And, of course, he could be well below replacement. Certainly a fine guy to take a rider on, given that he costs nothing for the time being. We'll see what the Reds' scouts think of him in spring training.
Photo by the AP


  1. I believe Wilson was injured each of the last two seasons and he had shoulder surgery last June. He's got pretty good career numbers against lefties, so hopefully it was just the injuries that have been holding him back the last couple of seasons. Given that this is a fairly low-risk move, I think it's a smart one by Krivsky. There's a good chance it won't work, but if it does, it could be a big benefit to the Reds.

  2. Braves fans think he's the worst-fielding 1B in baseball:

    From 2004-2006, Pirates fans thought he was a slightly below-average fielding 1B.

  3. @tango, thanks for that. Depending on who's right, he goes from a +0.5 WAR player to a -0.5 WAR player. Yikes.

  4. Gee whiz, and I didn't even include him in my strikeout projections. If he gets much playing time, they could easily set a new team record.

  5. So who's better a better bench guy, Phillips (Andy, of course) or Wilson? And what about Hatteberg/Votto? I don't mind this signing at all, but I just wonder what will come from all of these first basemen. It's like catchers last year. It sure is awesome to have some depth, though. Good depth, too. Wilson and Phillips (snicker) aren't like the Moellers of the world...

  6. @Daedalus, it's hard to say on Phillips v. Wilson. Both would seem to be behind Keppinger at this point in terms of a right-handed option at first base. I'm willing to bet that Kepp will be a nice defensive asset at first base as well, while there's mixed views on what Wilson brings to the table. No idea about Andy Phillips' fielding.

    The Votto/Hatteberg conflict is a bigger problem, and I have no clue how that might get resolved. Both probably should be platooned, and neither can really play anywhere but 1B... I do sort of wonder if Hatteberg could don his catching gear again, at least some of the time. Sure would be nice to have both his and Votto's bats in the lineup. We'll see. -j