What I tried to do in this piece is to do a comprehensive projection of the Reds ballclub and use that as a basis of looking forward at this coming season. This is kind of an extension to my recent pieces on 2009 catchers and 2009 opening day outfielders, but extended to the entire team. It addresses many of the very reasonable and problematic concerns that folks had about the outfield study in a manner that I think is pretty reasonable.
The results were surprising, to say the least, especially on offense:
Overall, after working through the projections and forcing the plate appearances to match last years' Reds, my estimate for 2009 Reds offense was.... 25 runs above average. If the NL average is 734 runs scored per team, as it was last year, that would put the Reds at 759 runs scored. That would have ranked sixth in the league in 2008. And this is from a team that scored just 704 runs last year with a partial season of Adam Dunn. Granted, if you adjust for park effects, you should cull 15 or so runs off of this total. But even so, most of us think of the Reds as a below-average hitting team these days. These data indicate that this isn't the case.All rate stats are built upon CHONE, but I assigned playing time via a process that is part objective and part intuition. The article has a description of these methods at its end. The total projected plate appearances are matched to last year's team PA's, while the innings pitched are matched to last year's IP.
In the interest of showing my work, here are projected statistics for all players on this imaginary Reds team of mine:
Hitters | PT-Coef | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | lwts | RAR | FLD | PosAdj | WAR |
Brandon Phillips | 100% | 594 | 550 | 149 | 27 | 4 | 22 | 38 | 95 | 6 | 20 | 6 | 0.271 | 0.325 | 0.455 | 0.338 | 7.5 | 25.5 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 3.6 |
Joey Votto | 100% | 576 | 512 | 146 | 31 | 2 | 24 | 62 | 115 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 0.285 | 0.365 | 0.494 | 0.373 | 21.8 | 39.3 | 2.7 | -9.7 | 3.4 |
Jay Bruce | 100% | 536 | 493 | 136 | 26 | 4 | 27 | 40 | 139 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 0.276 | 0.334 | 0.509 | 0.361 | 15.5 | 31.8 | 1.7 | -5.4 | 3.0 |
Edwin Encarnacion | 100% | 561 | 499 | 140 | 31 | 1 | 23 | 54 | 94 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0.281 | 0.360 | 0.485 | 0.368 | 19.6 | 36.7 | -12.1 | 1.9 | 2.8 |
Ramon Hernandez | 100% | 467 | 425 | 113 | 22 | 1 | 16 | 37 | 63 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0.266 | 0.332 | 0.435 | 0.336 | 4.1 | 18.3 | -3.7 | 7.8 | 2.4 |
Alex Gonzalez | 100% | 432 | 400 | 103 | 23 | 1 | 12 | 28 | 74 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0.258 | 0.313 | 0.410 | 0.317 | -3.3 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 4.4 | 1.5 |
Willy Taveras | 100% | 543 | 502 | 137 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 35 | 82 | 6 | 39 | 9 | 0.273 | 0.328 | 0.341 | 0.303 | -7.9 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
Jonny Gomes | 74% | 327 | 282 | 72 | 15 | 1 | 18 | 40 | 86 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0.255 | 0.357 | 0.507 | 0.373 | 12.7 | 22.6 | -7.1 | -3.3 | 1.3 |
Chris Dickerson | 75% | 375 | 329 | 78 | 15 | 4 | 12 | 43 | 120 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 0.238 | 0.330 | 0.419 | 0.330 | 1.5 | 12.9 | 1.7 | -3.8 | 1.2 |
Jeff Keppinger | 57% | 294 | 271 | 80 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.297 | 0.353 | 0.408 | 0.339 | 2.7 | 11.6 | -2.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Ryan Hanigan | 43% | 163 | 145 | 38 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.262 | 0.345 | 0.362 | 0.321 | -1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 0.7 |
Jerry Hairston Jr. | 74% | 248 | 226 | 60 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 34 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0.265 | 0.328 | 0.395 | 0.321 | -0.9 | 6.6 | 1.5 | -2.5 | 0.6 |
Danny Richar | 29% | 153 | 140 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 26 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.261 | 0.321 | 0.418 | 0.324 | -0.2 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Norris Hopper | 37% | 140 | 130 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0.290 | 0.339 | 0.364 | 0.316 | -1.2 | 3.0 | 1.9 | -1.4 | 0.4 |
Adam Rosales | 29% | 143 | 131 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.254 | 0.313 | 0.426 | 0.322 | -0.3 | 4.0 | -1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Paul Janish | 29% | 140 | 127 | 30 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.233 | 0.305 | 0.350 | 0.294 | -3.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 |
Wilkin Castillo | 21% | 93 | 89 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.249 | 0.288 | 0.354 | 0.284 | -3.3 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
Pitchers | 6% | 326 | 313 | 39 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 108 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.124 | 0.159 | 0.157 | 0.146 | -39.0 | -29.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -3.1 |
Totals | 6110 | 5564 | 1450 | 288 | 30 | 179 | 493 | 1163 | 53 | 131 | 42 | 0.261 | 0.327 | 0.420 | 0.328 | 25 | 210 | -8 | 0 | 21 |
PT-Coef is a playing time coefficient that I used to adjust time for each player. lwts is relative to average, and RAR is a conversion of that number to replacement level (using 2.0 wins/season as replacement in the NL). FLD is Rally's fielding projection, PosAdj are Tom Tango's position adjustment numbers based the designated CHONE position (I did change Hairston to an OF). WAR is the sum of RAR, FLD, and PosAdj.
None of the offensive numbers are park adjusted (i.e. they are given as expected to be seen playing half of one's games in GABP)--this is because I wanted to directly compare them to 2008 raw numbers. But that means that the WAR values, in particular, are overestimates of value if you wanted to take them and convert them to
You'll note that the smallest number of PA's went to Castillo with 93. Most "real" teams have a lot of players in the 10-30 range by the end of the season, and they don't tend to be good performances. I sort of think of Castillo's and maybe Janish's line as essentially taking all of those performances and lumping them together. So I don't think that's a huge problem here, though I could be wrong..
Now the pitchers:
Pitchers | G | GS | IP | ERA | ER | R | H | HR | BB | SO | HB | RAR |
Edinson Volquez | 30 | 30 | 166 | 3.58 | 66 | 71 | 138 | 16 | 78 | 170 | 9 | 34 |
Aaron Harang | 29 | 29 | 193 | 4.01 | 86 | 93 | 192 | 26 | 50 | 162 | 5 | 31 |
Bronson Arroyo | 30 | 30 | 188 | 4.40 | 92 | 99 | 196 | 24 | 62 | 143 | 7 | 21 |
Johnny Cueto | 27 | 27 | 146 | 4.19 | 68 | 74 | 138 | 21 | 54 | 130 | 9 | 19 |
Micah Owings | 20 | 20 | 111 | 4.29 | 53 | 57 | 109 | 14 | 39 | 86 | 10 | 13 |
Homer Bailey | 20 | 20 | 103 | 4.61 | 53 | 57 | 104 | 13 | 48 | 77 | 3 | 9 |
Francisco Cordero | 65 | 0 | 64 | 3.38 | 24 | 26 | 54 | 5 | 28 | 69 | 2 | 7 |
Bill Bray | 62 | 0 | 62 | 3.48 | 24 | 26 | 54 | 6 | 25 | 65 | 2 | 5 |
Jared Burton | 60 | 0 | 68 | 3.97 | 30 | 32 | 63 | 7 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 2 |
Mike Lincoln | 42 | 0 | 45 | 4.00 | 20 | 22 | 44 | 5 | 16 | 36 | 2 | 2 |
Nick Masset | 49 | 0 | 57 | 3.95 | 25 | 27 | 56 | 5 | 22 | 47 | 2 | 2 |
Matthew Maloney | 2 | 2 | 12 | 4.34 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
Ramon A Ramirez | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4.38 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
Arthur Rhodes | 44 | 0 | 31 | 3.77 | 13 | 14 | 28 | 2 | 15 | 31 | 1 | 1 |
Daniel Herrera | 42 | 0 | 49 | 4.41 | 24 | 26 | 50 | 7 | 17 | 37 | 2 | 1 |
Daryl Thompson | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4.73 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
Pedro Viola | 13 | 0 | 15 | 4.91 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 1 | -1 |
Dave Weathers | 60 | 0 | 62 | 4.35 | 30 | 32 | 63 | 6 | 26 | 40 | 3 | -1 |
Josh Roenicke | 51 | 0 | 50 | 4.50 | 25 | 27 | 49 | 7 | 24 | 47 | 2 | -1 |
RAR in this case is straight from Rally's tables (prorated for innings), and so it should be park-neutral. He also (somehow) adjusts for fielding, and given how close the Reds' forecasted team is to average in the field (it should be just a bit below average), I see no real payoff to trying to do any further adjustments. This rotation, if it lives up to these numbers, would be freaking fantastic. Let's hope it at least comes close!
Anyway, that at least should help you see where these data are coming from.s.
You'll note that the smallest number of PA's went to Castillo with 93. Most "real" teams have a lot of players in the 10-30 range by the end of the season, and they don't tend to be good performances. I sort of think of Castillo's and maybe Janish's line as essentially taking all of those performances and lumping them together. So I don't think that's a huge problem here, though I could be wrong..
Now the pitchers:
Pitchers | G | GS | IP | ERA | ER | R | H | HR | BB | SO | HB | RAR |
Edinson Volquez | 30 | 30 | 166 | 3.58 | 66 | 71 | 138 | 16 | 78 | 170 | 9 | 34 |
Aaron Harang | 29 | 29 | 193 | 4.01 | 86 | 93 | 192 | 26 | 50 | 162 | 5 | 31 |
Bronson Arroyo | 30 | 30 | 188 | 4.40 | 92 | 99 | 196 | 24 | 62 | 143 | 7 | 21 |
Johnny Cueto | 27 | 27 | 146 | 4.19 | 68 | 74 | 138 | 21 | 54 | 130 | 9 | 19 |
Micah Owings | 20 | 20 | 111 | 4.29 | 53 | 57 | 109 | 14 | 39 | 86 | 10 | 13 |
Homer Bailey | 20 | 20 | 103 | 4.61 | 53 | 57 | 104 | 13 | 48 | 77 | 3 | 9 |
Francisco Cordero | 65 | 0 | 64 | 3.38 | 24 | 26 | 54 | 5 | 28 | 69 | 2 | 7 |
Bill Bray | 62 | 0 | 62 | 3.48 | 24 | 26 | 54 | 6 | 25 | 65 | 2 | 5 |
Jared Burton | 60 | 0 | 68 | 3.97 | 30 | 32 | 63 | 7 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 2 |
Mike Lincoln | 42 | 0 | 45 | 4.00 | 20 | 22 | 44 | 5 | 16 | 36 | 2 | 2 |
Nick Masset | 49 | 0 | 57 | 3.95 | 25 | 27 | 56 | 5 | 22 | 47 | 2 | 2 |
Matthew Maloney | 2 | 2 | 12 | 4.34 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
Ramon A Ramirez | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4.38 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
Arthur Rhodes | 44 | 0 | 31 | 3.77 | 13 | 14 | 28 | 2 | 15 | 31 | 1 | 1 |
Daniel Herrera | 42 | 0 | 49 | 4.41 | 24 | 26 | 50 | 7 | 17 | 37 | 2 | 1 |
Daryl Thompson | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4.73 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
Pedro Viola | 13 | 0 | 15 | 4.91 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 1 | -1 |
Dave Weathers | 60 | 0 | 62 | 4.35 | 30 | 32 | 63 | 6 | 26 | 40 | 3 | -1 |
Josh Roenicke | 51 | 0 | 50 | 4.50 | 25 | 27 | 49 | 7 | 24 | 47 | 2 | -1 |
RAR in this case is straight from Rally's tables (prorated for innings), and so it should be park-neutral. He also (somehow) adjusts for fielding, and given how close the Reds' forecasted team is to average in the field (it should be just a bit below average), I see no real payoff to trying to do any further adjustments. This rotation, if it lives up to these numbers, would be freaking fantastic. Let's hope it at least comes close!
Anyway, that at least should help you see where these data are coming from.
Update: More discussion at RedsZone, RedReporter, and RedLegNation.
I think it's fair to say this is an "if everything goes right" scenario, to get the Reds to 85 wins. Notice there are no wipeouts on the pitching staff, no one having as bad a season with the bat as Patterson did last year.
ReplyDelete...But on the other hand, no one's having a phenomenal year, either. No one here is projected to hit 30 home runs. No starter is projected with a sub-3 (or even sub-3.5) ERA. No one is even projected to throw 200 innings or get 650 PA's...
ReplyDelete-j